Supported By
We make decisions based on whatever we have at our disposal, including theory, equipment, testing and measurement, intuition, and finally, critical listening – the key is attaining the right balance.
Focus on the just-released TM2, designed to be a simple and effective way to test in-ear monitors (IEMs) for potential damage and/or performance degradation.
Exploring the matter that how an analyzer is set up can greatly affect the appearance of the results.
When audience members are seated inside their vehicles listening to the PA, what effect does this have on the listening experience?
Tackling inverted frequency response, lavalier microphone challenges, and the old “egg crates as acoustic treatment” trick.
Human judgment will always be part of the equation, because the analyzer only knows how to answer certain questions.
In audio, as with everything in life, there are always a few situations or moments that slightly spoil the mood and get under our (or at least “my”) skin…
Clarifying “FFT vs RTA vs transfer function” along with “frequency response vs magnitude response” and several other areas sometimes misunderstood.
Researching the impact of drop ceiling tiles utilzing two key factors of how sound behaves within a room.
Church Audio Tech Training Available Through Church Sound University. Find Out More!