Supported By
Continuing the conversation on the spectral response of sound systems, this time focusing on some of the technical justifications for choosing a specific direction.
Though it’s immediately obvious that masks deaden sound coming from our mouths, the author wanted to objectively evaluate the effect. Here’s what he found…
Since every frequency present plays some role in defining the overall shape of the composite signal, we can’t change one without changing the whole.
Our mind’s ability to recognize, learn and store good, bad and unusual sounds is the mental gateway to the audio mixing craft.
Attaining accurate frequency response data from headphones and in-ear monitors has long been a ‘missing link’ in a quality monitoring signal chain.
Using these “truth tellers” to address some common system tuning problems.
The overall landscape as well as myriad options in fulfilling three major functions in optimization: prediction, control, and measurement.
Insights from design engineer Sam Feine on some of the elements and advantages in a modern loudspeaker development workflow.
Evaluating two tools designed to foster measuring in-ear monitors (IEM) with an audio analyzer.
Church Audio Tech Training Available Through Church Sound University. Find Out More!