Study Hall

Tech Tip Of The Day: Microphone Diaphragm Classification

What's the difference between a small, medium, and large diaphragm microphone?

Provided by Sweetwater.

Q: I’ve been doing home-based recording for a while now and I’m nearly to the point where I’m ready to make a more serious investment in my equipment.

I’ve heard that a good place to start is making sure you have a good quality microphone, so I’ve been doing some shopping lately.

However, one thing that really trip’s me up is all this small, medium, and large diaphragm stuff.

I mean, I understand that it’s just describing the size of the diaphragm, but what really defines small, medium, and large?

A: First of all, good choice in searching out a quality microphone. Between the input to your system and your monitoring chain, you’ll be well on the well to a quality recording setup.

Regarding the classification of diaphragms, there are no final standards regarding a diaphragm sizes.

However, most professionals and manufacturers agree that any diaphragm smaller than 5/8” would be considered a small diaphragm. Generally speaking, small diaphragm microphones tend to do a good job of capturing high frequency content and transients.

They will tend to have a bit more “air” to their sound and often have less coloration than medium diaphragm or large diaphragm microphones.

Most of this is due to the reduced mass of the smaller diaphragm, which allows it to more closely follow any air disturbances it is subjected to.

The definition of medium diaphragm is a potentially controversial subject. Historically there have been large diaphragm and small diaphragm mics, but more recently the medium size has began to carve out its own category, though not everyone agrees on the precise upper and lower limits.

Most professionals and manufacturers agree that any microphone with a diaphragm near 5/8” to 3/4” can be characterized as a medium diaphragm microphone.

Generally speaking, medium diaphragm microphones tend to do a decent job of accurately catching transients and high frequency content (as a small diaphragm would) while delivering a slightly fuller, round and potentially warmer sound (as a large diaphragm might).

Any microphone with a diaphragm larger than (and potentially including) 3/4” is considered to be a large diaphragm microphone.

In general, large diaphragm microphones tend to have a “big” sound that engineers find especially pleasing where a little more character might be advantageous, such as is the case with most vocals. large diaphragms are generally more sensitive than small diaphragm or medium diaphragm mics because of the increased surface area.

A common myth is that large diaphragm mics capture more low frequencies than small diaphragm mics.

Sometimes their coloration may make it sound like this is the case, but a properly designed small diaphragm mic is more likely to be accurate throughout a wide range of frequencies, whereas the coloration of a large diaphragm mic can tend to enhance certain desirable characteristics in a sound, which sometimes amounts to more apparent bass or low end.

As always, we welcome input from the PSW community and would love to know your thoughts on the subject of microphone diaphragm classification. Feel free to let us know in the comments below.

For more tech tips go to Sweetwater.com

Study Hall Top Stories