Supported By

Countryman Mics Delivers Necessary Intelligibility During Healthcare Panel Discussion

Location sound mixer Ty Ford utilizes Country EMW lavalier microphones during health care panel.

Countryman EMW omnidirectional lavalier microphones were vital during a recent studio shoot for an online peer exchange among a community of oncologists.

The event, held at BlueRock Productions in Baltimore, consisted of five doctors who were actively engaged in a constructive and lively discussion about the current state of cancer pharmacology.

The ability to ensure clean, clear dialog was essential on this project and the EMW microphones did not disappoint.

Ty Ford, a Baltimore, MD-based location sound mixer was contracted to handle audio for the studio-based panel discussion project.

“One of the biggest challenges with projects of this nature is delivering a high level of speech intelligibility while minimizing the assorted snorts, coughs, breathing, and related sounds that inevitably occur,” Ford explained. “The Countryman EMWs are a great choice for this type of application. For starters, they don’t have ‘that lav sound’ that end address lavalieres frequently have.

“Equally important, as a side address device, they aren’t as susceptible to down-breathing, snorts, and similar sounds. Further, the wraparound polymer shell reduces fabric rubbing noise from clothing.”

There were five doctors seated behind a slightly angled counter during the discussion with the center doctor as the leader/facilitator. Because the outer two doctors were only going to be looking towards the center, the EMWs were positioned not on their ties, but moderately high on the lapels closest to the center of the group.

“I went high with positioning of the EMWs to reduce the amount of room ring that existed on the large soundstage and I did the same for the next two mics,” adds Ford. “On the center doctor, I again positioned the EMW a bit higher on his tie to reduce room ring, but not so high as to accentuate head turns.”

Because this shoot was for online consumption, the ability to achieve high quality signal on input was essential, as there would be no editing after the fact.

“I’m running a Sound Devices 664 production mixer and recorder these days,” Ford reports. “I could have recorded all tracks to the 664 in iso and created a mix, but the production company was using a Tricaster and wanted to get a full mix to go; no post production.

“Because there was no way of knowing who would talk next, the challenging acoustical environment of having five open mics on a large sound stage with a green screen cyclorama wall made me bring out a Shure FP410 Automixer to manage the various signals.

“I fed four of the EMWs to the FP410 and then to the 664. I then used one more input of the 664 for the fifth mic to record and mix to the Tricaster plus a video camera.”

Ford also discussed how impressed he was with Countryman’s support services.

“Countryman’s support is excellent,” he said. “While I’ve had very little occasion to contact the company, on the few times that I did, I found everyone to be very responsive and cordial—and that type of support gives one a high level of confidence when using their products.”

“The Countryman EMW remains a solid choice for me. The EMW’s ability to grab high frequencies from the acoustical space you’re in makes these mics a nice match for use with boom microphones,” he concludes. “I’ve also used the EMWs with Rycote Stickies planted right on the sternum under wardrobe and achieved excellent results.

Read More
Not So Mysterious: Using Polarity As A Tool For Optimizing Drum Sound

“In addition to my EMWs, I’ve also had great success with my B6 and E6 earset mics. The bottom line is this: When I use my Countryman mics, I know I’ll get the results I’m after.”