Study Hall
Sponsored by
Audio Technica

Choose Your Battles: Examining Dispersion & Pattern Control In Line Arrays

Resorting to equalization to resolve the "too much of a good thing" issues in sound reinforcement might not actually be the solution you're searching for...

By Merlijn van Veen June 11, 2018

If a battle can't be won, don't fight it. -- Sun Tzu

Whenever we experience too much of a particular frequency or frequency range, we’re tempted to resort to equalization to resolve the situation. In this article, we’ll see that the effectiveness of EQ relies entirely on the relative level separation from other sources.

I design line arrays (Figure 1) as modular composite coupled point sources. Each individual module is effectively a perfect symmetrical arc. The splay angles are purposely set to achieve a 6 dB level drop (Figure 2, Plot 6), front-to-back, in the frequency range where the waveguides become sole custodians (typically 2 kHz and up).

Mid and high frequencies approximate cylindrical wave behavior (3 dB per doubling distance) up to a certain distance, and this way, the low frequencies that are typically bound to spherical waves (6 dB per doubling distance) for finite-length arrays have a chance of keeping up, once their loss rate has been decelerated by LF buildup/room gain (not shown in SPL plots).

With the waveguides as sole custodians, designing line arrays is a relatively simple matter of “point-and-shoot” (amplitude steering). Unfortunately, at low frequencies, single line array elements are effectively omnidirectional. This renders them immune to rotation and therefore splay. Instead, the overall array geometry is the driving force (phase steering) behind low frequency control.

Figure 1: Composite coupled point source (line array).

Ultimately, vertical pattern control is achieved by committee. It’s a balancing act of “beam-narrowing” in the low end versus “beam-spreading” in the high end. Vertical pattern control begins with roughly 72 degrees (Figure 2, Plot 4) at the frequency whose wavelength matches the length of the array (number of loudspeakers times their spacing).

Figure 2: Vertical pattern behavior.

Conventional arrays, however, tend to do a little too much of a good thing after the onset of pattern control. L-Acoustics refer to this as the “beaming frequency” (Figure 3) since the introduction of the V-DOSC line array in the early 1990s. For this particular array, the beaming frequency is approximately 500 Hz (Figure 2, Plot 5).

We can clearly see a concentrated beam of energy, perpendicular to the entire array, overshooting the beginning of the audience and making a nosedive before the end of coverage. This beam is typically about one-third narrower than the array’s nominal coverage angle observed at higher frequencies.

Figure 3: Beaming frequency.


Read the rest of this post

1
2
3


About Merlijn

Merlijn van Veen
Merlijn van Veen

Live Sound Engineer, Harlekijn Holland B.V.
 
Based in The Netherlands, Merlijn van Veen (https://www.merlijnvanveen.nl) is a consultant specializing in sound system design and optimization, and he’s also a noted audio educator.

Comments

Have something to say about this PSW content? Leave a comment! Scroll past the ”Post Comment” button below to view any existing comments.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Vlad says

To my soot Meyer sound - does not produce linear arrays (in the classical sense) - they do not have RF waveguides !!!

Tagged with:

Subscribe to Live Sound International

Subscribe to Live Sound International magazine. Stay up-to-date, get the latest pro audio news, products and resources each month with Live Sound.