Live Sound
Sponsored by

Just A Theory? Understanding Established Audio Concepts & Practices

In a mathematically, theoretically perfect world everything works best if it’s all nice and parallel, however that's not the world we live in.

By Jonah Altrove June 6, 2017

I recently worked to assist a national touring artist’s system tech as he toured through one of the venues I mix.

The band opted to use all their own production (fine by me!) so my job basically consisted of lending a hand throughout the day as needed.

The room has a concrete floor and walls, and a sheet metal ceiling. The ceiling height is about 12 feet and the room measures 46 feet by about 120 feet.

Halfway back, there’s a concrete ceiling beam that cuts the height down to about 10 feet. In other words…

The space is an acoustic nightmare.

Subs were originally deployed as a standard L/R configuration. However, as we walked the room during sine wave tests, there was extreme variation in level due to comb filters, exacerbated by the strong reflections off the walls. (A 2-element deployment turns into a multi-element deployment, as the concrete walls act as acoustic “mirrors” at low frequencies.)

After allowing the tech ample time to attempt to solve the problem on his own, I politely suggested laying out all of the subs in a single line in front of the stage.

This deployment is generally avoided in wider venues, because the line array creates a response that narrows coverage off to the sides of the array, resulting in a narrow, almost rectangular dispersion that throws most of its energy straight forward and backward. Sometimes the boxes are driven with various amounts of delay to steer the coverage in a wider pattern, to offset this.

In this case, however, this narrowing of coverage is exactly what we needed, as the lack of coherent sideways energy meant that reflections off the side walls were greatly reduced. As a result, LF coverage became more consistent throughout the space. Score one for array theory.

Mains were mid-size line array cabinets, stacked three per side on 6-foot tall scaffolding. In this configuration, the top box just barely had a clean throw to the back of the room without bouncing off the ceiling beam. Because the scaffolds were located at the extreme edges of the stage – right up against the walls – two issues were created.

The gap between the two sides of the PA dictated the use of front fills. Not a problem, really, as the tour was carrying some. The other issue is that the boxes were so wide (120-degree dispersion) that almost half of the energy from each box would immediately hit the concrete wall and bounce back into the room.

This was obviously inadvisable, particularly in a room with excessive reverberation and intelligibility issues.

I asked the tech if he would like us to angle the boxes inwards to reduce the dead area in the front rows, and to reduce the amount of energy hitting the side walls. He said that line arrays should always be parallel and can never be angled. “It’s just not… it’s not the theory,” were his exact words to me.

Read the rest of this post


About Jonah

Jonah Altrove
Jonah Altrove

Veteran Live Audio Professional
Jonah Altrove is a veteran live audio professional on a constant quest to discover more about the craft. Send him your "Ask Jonah" questions at [email protected]


Have something to say about this PSW content? Leave a comment!

Scroll past the ”Post Comment” button below to view any existing comments. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tagged with:

Subscribe to Live Sound International

Subscribe to Live Sound International magazine. Stay up-to-date, get the latest pro audio news, products and resources each month with Live Sound.