Study Hall

Supported By

Backstage Class: How Not To Record A Live Album

A case study in breaking the "golden rules" of recording -- and getting away with it...

For the three tracks with just one input (bass, trumpet and lead vocal), I was able to use the desk channel direct outputs to record an unprocessed signal. For the other five tracks, there was no choice but to use subgroups to combine the channels I needed, which meant those signals would be post everything (i.e., inserts, EQ and fader).

This required that I be acutely aware at all times of how any of the processing would affect the recording mix, and to try to seek a compromise between the demands of the two outlets. Thankfully my methods for applying EQ, gates and compressors are quite subtle so I was confident this would work; the key was being careful not to make any large or sudden moves.

Rule 3: Always employ redundancy and have a backup recording system.

You only get one take at a live recording, so any equipment failure that causes the recording to fail is catastrophic. A second recorder, ADAT machine or laptop can provide a handy back-up should the primary device fail, and this redundancy should be considered a vital part of the recording set-up.

However, this option wasn’t available on this project, so I decided that the best option would be to record all 15 shows on the tour and hope that the best performances could be compiled into a coherent album.

Rule 4: Adequately capture the audience/ambient sound.

Hearing the crowd respond to the live performance really helps the listener to immerse themselves in the playback and imagine they’re present at the concert. Ambient microphones will also pick up some of the sound of the band and PA system propagating in the room which, when added to the dry multi-channel recording, can really add life and glue the whole recording together.

But because the recorder didn’t have any additional tracks available, I came up with the simple solution of recording the audience sound separately using a stereo microphone plugged into my laptop. This meant I would have to manually synchronize the two recordings in the mix, but there really wasn’t any other choice.

Necessity & Invention

By far the biggest challenge in the mix was to inflate that single track of mono drums into something resembling a full-fledged drum kit – it would sound weak if the drums weren’t pumping.

The solution was to duplicate the drum track four times and EQ each of the copies differently: one low-passed to bring out the kick, one band-passed to bring out the snare, and a pair high-passed to act as overheads (one of which was delayed a small amount to create a pseudo-stereo effect when panned). This enabled me not just to modify and mix the key elements of the kit, but also to apply reverb only where I wanted it.

The tracks featuring multiple inputs, which I had been forced to record post fader via subgroups, actually presented few problems. The fader moves done live translated well to the recording mix, balancing the instruments in the same way I had done live. Any wayward fader movements were easily corrected with fader automation.

The decision to record multiple shows in lieu of having a backup system resulted in many hours of recordings to trawl through to find the best performances, but fortunately there were no issues with the equipment and we managed to capture every note of every show.

Read More
In The Studio: Dynamic EQ For Vocals

Synchronizing the audience tracks with the eight-track recording proved to be fiddly but ultimately straightforward. In most cases, there were stick hits on the drum tracks that could be used to visually align them. I then fine tuned the alignment by panning the audience recording to one side and the eight-track recording to the other so that when I listened on headphones it was much easier to identify and correct any timing discrepancies.

About halfway through the project, I needed to go out on tour again but the mix needed to be finished, leading me to break one last golden rule.

Rule 5: Never mix exclusively on headphones.

When we listen to music via loudspeakers, our ears don’t just hear the signal from the nearest loudspeaker(s), they also hear signal from the further loudspeaker(s), which is slightly obscured by the acoustic shadow of our head. There are also reflections from the walls, ceiling and floor that combine in a complex way to create what we consider to be a natural sound.

But when using headphones, the left ear only hears signal from the left loudspeaker, and vice versa, which can make it harder to judge the sound and positioning of individual elements as well as the mix as a whole. This is why it’s generally considered a bad idea to mix exclusively on headphones.

The Korg D888 recorder used on the project.

The requirement to finish the recording mix while on tour meant I had no choice but to use headphones. Therefore, I had to trust the EQ and panning decisions made when mixing on loudspeakers, using them as my reference points for making any further changes to the mix. Every time I made a major change, it was saved as a different incremental version so that I could constantly reference back to the original to make sure I wasn’t straying too far from the path.

Different Path

The series of decisions forced by equipment restrictions ultimately resulted in spending much more time on the project than if I’d done it “by the book.” A healthy combination of stubbornness and perseverance helped in achieving the desired result of producing a releasable album, but this project would not have been possible without modern hard disk recording technology and DAW software.

While I enjoyed the challenges, this is not a path I recommend. Let it be an object lesson in how not to record a live album.

Supported By

Celebrating over 50 years of audio excellence worldwide, Audio-Technica is a leading innovator in transducer technology, renowned for the design and manufacture of microphones, wireless microphones, headphones, mixers, and electronics for the audio industry.