
| SPL backlash - who's
to blame?
Posted by Eric on November 23, 1999 |
 
1
2
3

|
Most of you are familiar, I'm sure, with the NRA's stance on gun
control. Is it EAW, EV, JBL or Meyer's fault that people are losing
their hearing due to the misuse of these manufacturers’ products?
Of course not.
Is it the SR company's fault? Maybe. Is it the client’s fault
for asking us to do something we should know better than doing?
Definitely.
But in the end it is the responsibility of the person with their
fingers on the faders. Should government get involved in regulating
SPL at venues? Well, they already have, and with mixed reviews on
their techniques.
Not long ago I did a gig on the Boston Common on a Saturday afternoon.
After our soundcheck, a man with a Radio Shack SPL meter came up
to me and my A2, and sternly warned us that the PA could be no louder
than 80db.
After we asked "Who are you?"(he worked for the parks
department) - I asked him 80db “A” or “C”
weighted, and where his measurement would be from. He had no idea
why this mattered, and warned me he would be measuring from wherever
he felt it necessary. I then asked him if he was aware that he had
been talking to me over nearby traffic noise, and he himself had
been louder than 80db.
This, of course, seemed to him to be a defiant type of question
and he snarled and walked away. I told the client about this, and
explained the risk of a fine, if we couldn't get the guy to understand
his responsibility as "SPL watchdog". The client didn't
care, said they would pay any fine, and I mixed while my A2 dealt
with the parks guy.
My point is that it is the responsibility of the engineer to protect
his/her hearing and promote the safety of the audience. If the client
demands volume, with no regard to safety, maybe they shouldn't be
a client. Do you really want to work for someone that puts you in
danger of cutting your career short?
Fletcher and Munson proved that frequency response becomes flatter
at higher volume. Maybe this is why some engineers mix so loud.
They can't hear the subtlety of the mix in the first place and couldn't
do a well balanced mix to save their career. These guys make pros
look bad and help hype the client into thinking louder is better.
We live sound engineers have a moral and ethical obligation to deliver
a quality product without endangering those that our profession
relies on.
Posted by Tom Young on November 23, 1999
Right on. This issue has been surfacing on this board and others,
in conversation and in the press for a long time. And still we are
not dealing with it ourselves and anyone can see that it will become
necessary for laws to be written (and clauses in contracts) due
to more lawsuits being filed.
Just to throw in one more analogy: Car manufacturers are not held
liable for producing vehicles able to far exceed the highest of
speed limits. The driver is responsible.
Tom Young
Posted by Mike Russell on November 23, 1999
I think it's the listeners’ responsibility to protect their
hearing. Anyone who goes to a concert should know that it can get
loud, that's just common sense. Maybe the venues should have hearing
protection available for the audience and leave it up to them to
choose for themselves.
My 1/2 cent
Mike Russell
Posted by Charlie Escher on November 23, 1999
Hopefully not off topic, but auto racing has been dealing with SPL
regulation for many years. The CART race I attended last year had
ear plugs conspicuously for sale (for a buck I believe). VIP ticket
holders got them for free with their tickets. Not many people there
failed to use protection, at least close to the track where I was.
I couldn't handle the SPL for even a minute sans protection during
the race. These guys get away with very high levels, presumably
sound companies have similar constraints and rights? Just food for
thought...
Posted by Jim Gould on November 23, 1999
I feel the whole thing about level has to be controlled, or someone
will do it for us.I do think that, when most people come to a rock
show, they expect it to be loud. I guess the question should be
what is loud.
It is a matter of what you are used to, I think. Not that long ago,
I put a very potent system in a church. The purpose of the system
was to have the ability to do concert levels in a 1200 person sanctuary.
I remember talking with the commitee and some of the older members
were concerned that it would be loud.
I asked them loud in comparison to what? Would it be louder that
what you listen to your car radio at or your tv? Yes louder than
that. Would it be louder than a normal theatrical performance? No
that is what it was meant to do. It was also designed to make the
seats rattle with special effects for dramas and things. I have
mixed all types of bands for many years, and it is easier to be
too loud these days that it ever was.
I have always watched the crowd. I can tell when it is getting to
the point of too much. So much of it to me is very frequency dependent.
I have heard mixes of 100db that hurt me, and mixes of 110db that
sounded very good. I think the main thing missing in a lot of the
time is basic good musical taste.
I do not, and never will, wear earplugs when mixing. If I could
find some that kept the tonality exactly as it is without them,
I may, but so far no good. My ears, seasoned as they may be, are
the best judge, and if I am being hurt by it, it is too loud.
|