|
Transcript
Pro Sound Web Live Chat
With Tom Young
System Alignment And Delay
October 8, 2001
Moderated by Keith Clark
Page 1
|


1 2
3

|
(Editor's Note: Click
here to read Tom's ProSoundWeb article on alignment and delay.)
Moderator: Welcome to tonight's PSW live chat session with Tom Young,
who will be addressing questions regarding system alignment (and
misalignment), and delay techniques. Also feel free to ask Tom other
system/audio-related questions.
Bink: Say Tom, in your PSW article, you mention the empty spaces
between cabinets in an array. You say that a flat panel between
cabinets can help reduce those spaces, creating problems with out-of-phase
and delayed sounds interfering with the direct sound. What if that
same space is filled with a wedge that sticks out from the array
some few inches? Wouldn't that help more that a flat panel? I saw
McCune
Sound out of San Francisco putting these between cabs some ten
years ago.
Tom Young: I don't see how it would be better. Perhaps it reduces
higher frequency reflections (?).When I do the panels, I ensure
that the front surfaces are covered with fiberglass and cloth to
reduce these reflections. These are also measurable with Smaart.
Bink: Interesting.
Tom: What was most interesting to me is that you don't need to
fill the gap, just cover the opening.
Bink: What I saw were hardwood wedges that could possibly have
added some smearing.
Moderator: Yes, it seems to me that anything extending out, especially
hardwood, would have, perhaps, a detrimental effect.
Tom: Another interesting/puzzling aspect to this is that two boxes
don't appear to create a problem. Every time I check it out, it
takes three or more boxes (or two or more cavities) to result in
a serious notch in the combined response.
Bink: Why do you think that is?
Tom: I think that the notch comes from diffracted sound that wraps
around into the cavity and is re-emitted. I "think" that
one cavity and its re-emitted energy does not have enough level,
but two or more do. Remember that anything having to do with time-based
anomalies has a level component as well as a time component.
Bink: I'd like to see various manufacturers offer panels and mounting
holes to get your idea into an easier form.
Tom: I'm not sure that any manufacturer would find it cost effective
to provide panels. They will be used mostly by installers, and perhaps
a few enlightened temporary system providers who have the time to
do this. And the cavity openings vary from gig to gig, as you vary
the cluster rigging for specific coverage.
Moderator: What do you see as the single most common mistake and/or
misconception with regard to proper system alignment?
Tom: The biggest misconception is that system alignment is not
relevant or "perfect" because you align at certain mic
positions, and as soon as you are in a different listening spot,
things are misaligned (again). The reality is that aligning to one
(or several) mic positions significantly improves alignment for
all seating, assuming you chose correct mic positions.
Too Tall: How far off can a single speaker be in time alignment
(say between the highs and mids) before your ears can tell IF the
response has been EQ'd flat on axis?
Tom: The common wisdom is that folks hear delay beginning at about
30mS. But this is in general, and not frequency related. Alignment
of drivers within an enclosure can be beneficial down to the microsecond
level. My experience is that what you hear is less than perfect
response, and when you measure, you discover there is misalignment.
In other words, if a speaker is lousy, it probably has poor alignment
(plus lousy drivers). I do recall hearing a coaxial loudspeaker
where I knew it was out of alignment when I moved on-off axis. Measurement
verified this.
Tom (continued): But the real value of Smaart (and SIM
and TEF) is being
able to evaluate response of not just individual boxes, but how
they array and how their acoustics or architecture affect them.
Once you try a correction, you can verify whether anything was accomplished.
Moderator: Are there certain loudspeakers that are especially poor
with respect to alignment between drivers?
Tom: Sure. One can get very discouraged when you weigh in with
all of the problems that can exist in loudspeakers. But (again)
it is demonstrable that making small yet significant corrections
has an audible and beneficial effect.
Bink: If Too Tall's speaker is a two-way, and it is misaligned
by a few microseconds, then won't there be a place of perfect alignment
above or below the aiming point of the horn?
|