| Transcript
Live Chat with Rupert Neve
October 23, 2002
Moderated by Fletcher | |
Fletcher: Well, this man really needs no introduction. Pretty much
anyone who is involved with audio production seems to say his name
a few times a day in relation to something. Be it consoles we would
like to work on, or individual modules we would like to own, or
equipment that is used as a point of reference for our industry.
I'm probably asked 10-15 times a day if “it sounds like a
Neve" [the point of this 'chat' is to try to get a bit better
definition of just what that means]. So here's an opportunity to
have somewhat of a conversation with the first name we think of
when it comes to outstanding sounding audio equipment, a man I am
rather proud to call a friend... Mr. Rupert Neve.
Good evening Rupert.
Rupert Neve: Good Evening...
Fletcher: Here we go...
Chrissugar: In the early days [1073], the use of the output transformer
was a technical necessity or you used it to achieve a special sound…
Rupert Neve: This question goes to the heart of my
original designs. I used transformers because in those days it was
the only professional way of interconnecting equipment. We used
balanced lines by default, if you like.
Everything was balanced and worked between 600 ohms termination.
This meant that the modules which you are familiar with today would
be reconnected, recycled endlessly without the problem of ground
loops and so on.... When they sell old modules if doesn't benefit
me in my old age trying to build a retirement fund.
chrissugar: What do you think about the new designs with op-amps
[5532] compared to the old transistor designs?
Rupert: Well, to answer these I would start by saying how
long have you got? One of the qualities of the original designs
is that they were all single ended. This meant that there was no
crossover distortion. Every IC, or maybe I should say almost every
IC, includes the push-pull output stage and of course, it has very
small power capability.
Such a stage will produce small amounts, maybe some of them not
so small, of crossover distortion. Which is to say that there are
high order harmonics present which are not in the original music
--and I'm even incorrect calling them harmonics. They are spikes,
which occur at the repetition rate of the signal frequency.
And, although small in nature, it can be perceived not only by the
trained ear, but even by, shall we say "Joe Public". The
way he would notice it is that it produces sensation of frustration
as he listens to music.
Fletcher: How does the "Transformer Like Amplifier" (did
I get the name right?) behave in terms of "crossover distortion"?
Rupert: I think the first thing to say is the transformer
like amplifier can be configured with discrete transistors and it
would be if it were important. In my 9098 console there are, I believe,
last count, some 64 busses. I use transformers on all the main signal
busses but, entirely due to space and weight, I use the TLA transformer
like amplifier or auxiliary (auxiliaries) which are not as demanding
as the main busses.
However, I also use a technique which offsets the DC at the output
of the integrated circuits and so removes that crossover distortion
from the zero line and places it at a higher level, usually around
0 dBu. That makes a huge difference to the percentage of distortion.
Tom Borthwick: I have a 5106 console and on an Audio Precision test
it goes from 5 Hz to over 150hz. This extended bandwith, was it
a concerted effort or just the result of good design?
Rupert: Good question. Well Tom, I’m guessing what
you meant was 150 kHz not Hz. The transformers and all the amplifiers
in these designs were of that order. The console mentioned, if I
remember correctly, was a broadcast console, one of the later ones.
We were paying particular attention to bandwidth. Incidentally,
that console was designed by Geoff Watts, one of my earliest collegues
on my design team.
Fletcher: There has been some measure of debate about bandwidth
including frequencies above 20kHz, can we hear them, do they make
a difference, etc.
Rupert: OK, Fletch, pin your ears back...back in 1977, just
after I had sold the company, George Martin called me to say that
Air Studios had taken delivery of a Neve Console which did not seem
to be giving satisfaction to Geoff Emmerick. In fact, he said that
Geoff is unhappy.... engineers from the company, bear in mind that
at this point I was not primarily involved, had visited the studio
and reported that nothing was wrong. They said that the customer
is mad and that the problem will go away if we ignore it long enough.
Well I visited the studio and after careful listening with Geoff,
I agreed with him that three panels on this 48 panel console sounded
slightly different. We discovered that there was a 3 dB peak at
54kHz Geoff's golden ears had perceived that there was a difference.
We found that 3 transformers had been incorrectly wired and it was
a matter of minutes to correct this. After which Geoff was happy.
And I mean that he relaxed and there was a big smile on his face.
As you can imagine a lot of theories were put forward, but even
today I couldn't tell you how an experienced listener can perceive
frequencies of the normal range of hearing.
And following on from this, I was visiting Japan and was invited
to the laboratories of Professor Oohashi He had discovered that
when filteres were applied to an audio signal cutting off frequencies
of 20 kHz, the brain started to emit electric signals which can
be measured and quantified
These signals were at the frequencies and of the pattern which are
associated with frustration and anger. Clearly we discussed this
at some length and I also would forward the idea that any frequncies
which were not part of the original music, such as quantisizing
noise produced by compact discs and other digital sources, also
produced similar brain waves.
Fletcher: What about frequencies below 20Hz (theoretically, the
low end of the human range of hearing)... how do they affect the
tone?
Rupert: OK Fletch, now we get down to the meat and potatoes...
I believe it is necessary to not only maintain the frequency response,
to well below 20 Hz, but to keep the phase integrity. Failure to
do this produces a slight muddiness and again, it is very difficult
to quantify. All of my designs are kept within a phase shift of
between 2 and 5 degrees down to 10 Hz
Bink: What are the most important measurement specifications, in
your opinion? What specs can be thought of as less important than
the resultant 'sound'?
Rupert: This is almost impossible to answer... because it
depends on the function of a particular circuit. I suppose the most
significant measurement is to establish that there is virtually
no crossover distortion.
We currently in the Pure Path design for harmonics measured on an
Audio Precision System 2 less than 130 dB down. This also applies
an extremely low noise floor I'm sorry, I meant implies.... and
for example, the 9098 console was measured at unity gain has a dynamic
range of about 126 dB This of course is 6 dB better than any digital
system can yet deliver. These two measurements are probably the
most significant. Of course, when digital comes of age, we"
have circuits on the bench now which will deliver better than 140
dB of dynamic range!
Ronny: Speaking of keeping phase shift between 2 and 5 degrees.
Do you have any views on linear phase EQ?
Rupert Neve: Ronny, this is a perpetual question we
get asked all the time. I take it you would be referring to equalizer
and filters. When you apply equalization to an audio signal you
are enhancing or depleting a portion of the spectrum. And, phase
shift will always accompany that correction of equalization in the
analog domain This is part of nature.
You can experience it by simply cupping your hands around your mouth
and your voice will immediately change frequency response due to
the resonator you have now applied. If you did something similar
with a musical instrument the same would hold true. The acoustic
resonator which you are applying is following laws of nature that
include a lot of phase shift.
It sounds sweet and natural of course, some people's voices benefit
more than others!!
loudist: Please excuse me if this was already asked but... regarding
phase shift, isn't this one of the reasons tubes (valves) sound
better to most is that the phase shift of tubes is minimal compared
to solid state amplification?
Rupert Neve: This is not something I would agree with...
Tubes sound better because, for the most part, they are used in
single sided configurations or if they are used in push-pull the
crossover point is already biased well away from zero. Solid state
amplifiers are much easier to design with extremely low phase shift
Not specifically due to tubes vs. solid state but because the impedences
necessary to use in tube circuits make them somewhat more limited
Harvey: What's your opinion of "euphonic" (even order)
distortion products?
Rupert Neve: Harvey, this is another big subject.
Many years ago I listened to a lecture by Dr. James Moire at the
British Institute of Radio Engineers who had researched human sensitivity
to the different orders of harmonics. Odd harmonics are much more
readily perceived and are usually destructive to listening pleasure.
Whereas even harmonics tend to be benign I did some work on this
a few years ago and constructed a chart based on James Moire's findings
and of many friends in the industry which chose that human sensitivity
to harmonics is proportional to the frequency.
In fact it is hard to put into words but if I could show you this
chart.... I would be happy to publish it. The important point here
is once again the incredible sensitivity of humans to small distortions
or restrictions in amplifier performance which result in pleasure
or frustration. So let me get back to the question, did I answer
it or wander off into a most interesting sideline...
chrissugar: Considering that people like the classic NEVE sound
do you have any plans to remake these devices?
Rupert Neve: No designer wants to put the clock back
and indeed, there were many subtle differences in these old designs
depending upon the year that they were made and the available components
I regard many of these now as "effects units". I have
concentrated on pure designs which will be, or I should say, which
are totally transparent.
I have seen many studios use the old classics in this way to enhance
the performance of, shall we say, less satisfactory designs... But,
yes, we are expecting in the next 12 months to issue a range of
units which will have a behavior similar to the old classics. The
size and price of these is significantly lower than the originals
so if you're thinking of buying any more of my old modules wait
and see what is announced in the next few months.
dbock: I believe that the 1081 (class AB, four bands + shelves)
modules came after the 1073's (class A, fewer features). I've long
wondered if the dramatic changes that occurred when moving from
the 73 to the 81 were primarily engineering driven, market driven
(and if it was market driven, what was causing engineers of the
time to demand such a very class AB sound), or some combination
of the two?
Rupert Neve: Let's see. Well ,the engineers did not
demand an AB sound but there was more component density and consoles
were getting bigger all the time, so we had to reduce the current
that was drawn by the original circuits. There did not seem to be,
at that time, any reason for not doing it.
And, you know, this is progress. We now know what the effect of
making those changes is and all I can say is, please, in the next
few months, contribute to my pension fund, by purchasing the new
stuff which will have taken care of these criticisms, I hope.
jjjj: Is there any advantage in digital audio through a DA and into
the AMEK Purepath processed and then out the Digital IO. There has
been some discussion that Digital recorded samples will benefit
from the AMEK processing and resampling. What are your thoughts?
Rupert Neve: I'm not quite certain what you mean here.
What has been established is that if you mix in the analog domain
the integrity of your mixed signals is far more accurate than trying
to mix in the digital domain. The AMEK DIB, which is a driver in
a box, incorporates balanced mixing busses. Studios that have used
this unit as an analog mixer have been amazed at the way in which
the sound comes to life and attains a performance and space which
is not available with a digital mix..
Any DA or AD places some restrictions on audio performance. One
of the significant things that happen when you connect an AMEK Purepath
or even one of my old modules (which are transformer modules) is
the sonic improvement that seems to be applied to a digital signal.
I'm not sure if that answers the question but at any rate you have
given me a platform for my opinion.
loudist: Mr. Neve, I wanted to thank you for your discussion on
the web regarding the sampling 'stairstep' corner distortions in
present day A/D converters. What would be a solution to this anomoly?
Rupert Neve: Ok, simple answer. Higher sampling rates.
Bink: How much do you think IC manufacturers' unilateral decisions
to pull chips out of production will affect your future designs?
How do you design in a safety net for these caprices?
Rupert Neve: Bink -- you are trying to scare me! All
I can say is that solid state devices including very early transistors
which were manufactured 30 or 40 years ago are still available.
From esoteric sources Provided that they continue to be available
for the next 25 years it doesn't actually worry me, I'll then be
over 100 years old and maybe able to retire.
Fletcher: A little bird mentioned that you were planning on doing
some work with "iz Technologies"... anything you'd care
to talk about?
Rupert Neve: The problem is a straight commercial
one. There are a number of clients whom we are currently building
relationships with and designing products which will be available
within the next few months. Until they are ready to make public
announcements I can only tickle your sensitivities by speaking mysteriously.
One clue I can give you is that any digital device - and there are
some very good ones, now - benefit from extremely high quality analog
amplifiers both before and after the digital. In the case of iz,
they do have a remarkable hard disc recorder. I have listened to
material recorded on Radar and other hard disk machines and it is
now possible to hear imperfections which are caused by inadequate
mic or line pre's. I won't mention names but we now have to be very
meticulous about the analog source.
RPhilbeck: Mr. Neve, when you say, "we", are you refering
to AMEK?
Rupert Neve: Mr. R Philbeck, AMEK has been my faithful
client and friend for about 13 years. And most of what I am saying
applies to my relationship with them. But, I do have other clients;
one which you might find of interest, is not even in the pro audio
business. Taylor Guitars commissioned me to produce a totally new
pickup and amplifier. We collaborated and closed on their implementation
of a beautiful linear pickup. We have produced a range of guitars
and equalizers which will be shown the first time at the NAMM show
in January.
So these, too, will be come the "we" I am talking about.
My various clients and I. Life gets more and more interesting as
people become more and more aware of the need for a very high quality.
Lee: Do you have an opinion as to why it is so much more imperative
to have high quality amplifiers when recording to digital than tape?
Rupert Neve: Lee we are going back to the recorder.
You mention tape. Now let's bear in mind that even the best of our
lovely old tape machines had amplifiers in them which did not measure
up to the performance we can achieve today. The tape medium imposed
severe restrictions on the dynamic range and on the frequency response.
There was also a great deal of 3rd harmonic distortion which sounded
great with some material but you can have too much of a good thing.
The tape machine would mask imperfections in the source material
whereas even CD quality digital can produce dynamic range of 90
dB and a frequency response which may well be greater or at least
more reliable than the old tape machine
Therefore you can see that although the distortions inherent in
the low grade digital are extremely distressing one still has to
be very careful to maintain accurate source materials. I've expressed
that rather badly but I hope I've conveyed my feelings about it.
Fletcher: OK... a couple more, and we'll let Mr. Neve have the rest
of the evening off...
jason fee: Throughout your career what's been the best advice that
anyone's ever given you??
Rupert Neve: Now then, Fletch, I could have the rest
of the evening off after a couple more...but you don't know how
long this one can be.... probably the best advice came from an old
friend now deceased who was our accountant in the early days of
the Neve company When he showed me that we are, as humans, created
and designed, if you like, in the image of our creator - God. His
creativity is in a sense available to us and we recognize it and
use it responsibly. Hopefully.
So what we do is beyond ourselves. Perhaps another way of putting
it is that we strive, strive, strive knowing that we will never
reach the state of perfection in our designs. There is always another
step waiting, to be explored. We could say that there is always
room at the top. See you at the top!
Harvey: Would you care to comment on your friendship with Mark McQuilken?
Rupert Neve: Harvey -- yes, I first met Mark some
years ago when Evelyn and I came to live in Wimberly He is a brilliant
designer who has helped me from time to time especially to understand
the mysteries of the digital domain. I hold Mark and his family
high on my list of friends.
andrew_r: In your TapeOp interview, you mentioned http://www.Rupertneve.com
- any idea when the website might be up and running?
Rupert Neve: Andrew, we're working on it and, of course,
one of the problems is
were do you start? We hope that we'll get some stuff up in the next
few weeks.
Harvey: Thank you for a delightful evening.
Rupert Neve: Well, thank you folks, too. I'm sure
that having corresponded with several with you that may have tuned
in. I hope that it has been as interesting for you as it has been
for me.
Fletcher: On behalf of the entire PSW/UCI/RecPit and LAB crew,
I'd like to thank Rupert for sharing his time and knowledge with
us. A transcript of the chat will be available within the next 24
hours or so. Watch the PSW homepage for details.
|