| Transcript
Live Chat with Rupert Neve
October 23, 2002
Moderated by Fletcher |
 
1 2

|
Fletcher: Well, this man really needs no introduction. Pretty much
anyone who is involved with audio production seems to say his name
a few times a day in relation to something. Be it consoles we would
like to work on, or individual modules we would like to own, or
equipment that is used as a point of reference for our industry.
I'm probably asked 10-15 times a day if “it sounds like a
Neve" [the point of this 'chat' is to try to get a bit better
definition of just what that means]. So here's an opportunity to
have somewhat of a conversation with the first name we think of
when it comes to outstanding sounding audio equipment, a man I am
rather proud to call a friend... Mr. Rupert Neve.
Good evening Rupert.
Rupert Neve: Good Evening...
Fletcher: Here we go...
Chrissugar: In the early days [1073], the use of the output transformer
was a technical necessity or you used it to achieve a special sound…
Rupert Neve: This question goes to the heart of my
original designs. I used transformers because in those days it was
the only professional way of interconnecting equipment. We used
balanced lines by default, if you like.
Everything was balanced and worked between 600 ohms termination.
This meant that the modules which you are familiar with today would
be reconnected, recycled endlessly without the problem of ground
loops and so on.... When they sell old modules if doesn't benefit
me in my old age trying to build a retirement fund.
chrissugar: What do you think about the new designs with op-amps
[5532] compared to the old transistor designs?
Rupert: Well, to answer these I would start by saying how
long have you got? One of the qualities of the original designs
is that they were all single ended. This meant that there was no
crossover distortion. Every IC, or maybe I should say almost every
IC, includes the push-pull output stage and of course, it has very
small power capability.
Such a stage will produce small amounts, maybe some of them not
so small, of crossover distortion. Which is to say that there are
high order harmonics present which are not in the original music
--and I'm even incorrect calling them harmonics. They are spikes,
which occur at the repetition rate of the signal frequency.
And, although small in nature, it can be perceived not only by the
trained ear, but even by, shall we say "Joe Public". The
way he would notice it is that it produces sensation of frustration
as he listens to music.
Fletcher: How does the "Transformer Like Amplifier" (did
I get the name right?) behave in terms of "crossover distortion"?
Rupert: I think the first thing to say is the transformer
like amplifier can be configured with discrete transistors and it
would be if it were important. In my 9098 console there are, I believe,
last count, some 64 busses. I use transformers on all the main signal
busses but, entirely due to space and weight, I use the TLA transformer
like amplifier or auxiliary (auxiliaries) which are not as demanding
as the main busses.
However, I also use a technique which offsets the DC at the output
of the integrated circuits and so removes that crossover distortion
from the zero line and places it at a higher level, usually around
0 dBu. That makes a huge difference to the percentage of distortion.
Tom Borthwick: I have a 5106 console and on an Audio Precision test
it goes from 5 Hz to over 150hz. This extended bandwith, was it
a concerted effort or just the result of good design?
Rupert: Good question. Well Tom, I’m guessing what
you meant was 150 kHz not Hz. The transformers and all the amplifiers
in these designs were of that order. The console mentioned, if I
remember correctly, was a broadcast console, one of the later ones.
We were paying particular attention to bandwidth. Incidentally,
that console was designed by Geoff Watts, one of my earliest collegues
on my design team.
Fletcher: There has been some measure of debate about bandwidth
including frequencies above 20kHz, can we hear them, do they make
a difference, etc.
Rupert: OK, Fletch, pin your ears back...back in 1977, just
after I had sold the company, George Martin called me to say that
Air Studios had taken delivery of a Neve Console which did not seem
to be giving satisfaction to Geoff Emmerick. In fact, he said that
Geoff is unhappy.... engineers from the company, bear in mind that
at this point I was not primarily involved, had visited the studio
and reported that nothing was wrong. They said that the customer
is mad and that the problem will go away if we ignore it long enough.
Well I visited the studio and after careful listening with Geoff,
I agreed with him that three panels on this 48 panel console sounded
slightly different. We discovered that there was a 3 dB peak at
54kHz Geoff's golden ears had perceived that there was a difference.
We found that 3 transformers had been incorrectly wired and it was
a matter of minutes to correct this. After which Geoff was happy.
And I mean that he relaxed and there was a big smile on his face.
As you can imagine a lot of theories were put forward, but even
today I couldn't tell you how an experienced listener can perceive
frequencies of the normal range of hearing.
And following on from this, I was visiting Japan and was invited
to the laboratories of Professor Oohashi He had discovered that
when filteres were applied to an audio signal cutting off frequencies
of 20 kHz, the brain started to emit electric signals which can
be measured and quantified
These signals were at the frequencies and of the pattern which are
associated with frustration and anger. Clearly we discussed this
at some length and I also would forward the idea that any frequncies
which were not part of the original music, such as quantisizing
noise produced by compact discs and other digital sources, also
produced similar brain waves.
Fletcher: What about frequencies below 20Hz (theoretically, the
low end of the human range of hearing)... how do they affect the
tone?
Rupert: OK Fletch, now we get down to the meat and potatoes...
I believe it is necessary to not only maintain the frequency response,
to well below 20 Hz, but to keep the phase integrity. Failure to
do this produces a slight muddiness and again, it is very difficult
to quantify. All of my designs are kept within a phase shift of
between 2 and 5 degrees down to 10 Hz
Bink: What are the most important measurement specifications, in
your opinion? What specs can be thought of as less important than
the resultant 'sound'?
Rupert: This is almost impossible to answer... because it
depends on the function of a particular circuit. I suppose the most
significant measurement is to establish that there is virtually
no crossover distortion.
We currently in the Pure Path design for harmonics measured on an
Audio Precision System 2 less than 130 dB down. This also applies
an extremely low noise floor I'm sorry, I meant implies.... and
for example, the 9098 console was measured at unity gain has a dynamic
range of about 126 dB This of course is 6 dB better than any digital
system can yet deliver. These two measurements are probably the
most significant. Of course, when digital comes of age, we"
have circuits on the bench now which will deliver better than 140
dB of dynamic range!
Ronny: Speaking of keeping phase shift between 2 and 5 degrees.
Do you have any views on linear phase EQ?
Rupert Neve: Ronny, this is a perpetual question we
get asked all the time. I take it you would be referring to equalizer
and filters. When you apply equalization to an audio signal you
are enhancing or depleting a portion of the spectrum. And, phase
shift will always accompany that correction of equalization in the
analog domain This is part of nature.
You can experience it by simply cupping your hands around your mouth
and your voice will immediately change frequency response due to
the resonator you have now applied. If you did something similar
with a musical instrument the same would hold true. The acoustic
resonator which you are applying is following laws of nature that
include a lot of phase shift.
It sounds sweet and natural of course, some people's voices benefit
more than others!!
loudist: Please excuse me if this was already asked but... regarding
phase shift, isn't this one of the reasons tubes (valves) sound
better to most is that the phase shift of tubes is minimal compared
to solid state amplification?
|