|
Transcript
ProSoundWeb Live Chat
Tom Danley
SPL/Servodrive
March 12, 2002
Moderated by Keith Clark
|
 
1 2
3

|
Moderator: Can you elaborate a bit on what you believe has been
accomplished on the LAB Subwoofer
Forum to this point?
Tom: Well, we've arrived at a basic design, which did not involve
the use of any of the "normal" rules of thumb that seem
to govern horn design, and instead fine-tuned the design based on
its performance modeled in the computer. The result should be a
subwoofer that should outperform most similar sized boxes. Of course,
this won't be known as a fact until people have built them.
Harry: So no one has built this sub yet?
Tom: No, two of the people involved in the project are working
on CAD drawings. The drawings I posted are enough for me to build
a prototype and then get the final dimensions - but since the CAD
capability is there, and with two people who know how to do it,
they will be able to come up with the final dimensions without sawdust.
Harry: Did you pretty much design the LAB sub as far as sonics,
or was it collaboration with others?
Tom: Basically, I took what the computer said would be perfect
so far as the driver - and then modeled the actual horn and then
fine tuned the driver parameters based on the real life horn.
Too Tall: It (performance) may not be known then because it seems
to be very hard to get measurement data on other subs.
Tom: Well, hard data is sometimes hard to find in the audio industry.
However, side-by-side comparisons should also show the results.
Steve Gray: Is cooling really going to be an issue with the LAB
sub?
Tom: I should have thought more carefully about mentioning that
- the heat issue would certainly be no greater with this box than
another. The aluminum panel that I put in the design is there more
for clearance of the driver magnet than anything else. I threw in
the mention of the heat issue because it sounded like a good marketing
gimmick.
Steve Gray: I've been thinking about this "bilge pump idea"
for cooling; diaphragm and some quiet check valves.
Tom: "Bilge pump" - as in boat???
Steve Gray: Now come on....Diaphragm is the back of the cone providing
mechanical energy to move air through a pair of check valves.
Tom: In a highly efficient horn, one does not want any non-sound
radiating load on the cone as the power comes right off of the efficiency
side of the equation. On the other hand, cooling a voice coil, for
example, even a small amount of air flow causes a significant increase
in heat capacity.
On the other, other hand the cooling system in our Servodrive's
also takes power off the efficiency side so maybe some kind of check
valve system would be useable.
Steve Gray: My concern also. The venting would also make the rear
enclosure somewhat a periodic.
Tom: One would not want to lower the Q of that resonance very much
- again because that would reduce the efficiency. The horn actually
depends on the stiffness of the driver suspension and rear volume
for that resonance.
Weogo: Maybe Steve has something here. As cone moves forward, a
couple check valves open on one side of the box, close on the other.
Cone moves back and reverse happens.
Tom: Yes, it's possible that would work - we could try it on the
LAB woofer.
Steve Gray: So where do find some quiet "valves"?
Tom: Well, they don't have to be too quiet because they will be
right next to something making a lot of sound. Seriously, I have
a large antique engine, which uses a leather flap valve, and it
doesn't make any noise.
Al Limberg: Some years ago I believe it was SAE that used a passive
liquid cooling system on some of their amplifiers - probably a refrigerator
coil/coolant sort of thing. That might be a solution, with the 'coils'
thru the speaker chamber walls.
Tom: Yes, there is thing called a heat pipe - which uses capillary
action and for their size can conduct a surprising amount of heat
from one place to another.
Al Limberg: Air moving in the horn throat might aid the process
as well.
Tom: Yeah - that could be a good spot.
jack arnott: How about combine the two, make the motion of the
woofer power the capillary pump?
Tom: This is getting a little past the goal of the initial LAB
sub - maybe later once there is bunch out there, we could do a phase
two custom hot-rodding session.
Weogo: Tom, I know we all wish you well in your endeavors. What
do YOU want of the LAB sound community? Other than a bunch of box
orders?!
Tom: I want my kids to be able to enjoy concerts without going
deaf.
Moderator: Final question...and everyone feel free to transfer
the chat over to a PSW chat room and also on the Subwoofer Forum...
Here goes:
Ron S: Hey Tom I read your recent posts on line arrays and I'm
working on a project right now. Would I be better off instead of
using two 12-in drivers and a horn, using a single 12-in, a 10-in
and a horn ( 3-way )? And will a regular horn flare with a 40-degree
vertical work?
Tom: There are so many variables that I can't really give much
of an opinion. This may be more than we can tackle right now.
Moderator: Ron - might try posting on the LAB - sure to get plenty
of input.
Moderator: OK Tom, just one more: What's the most impressive sound
you've ever heard?
Tom: One of the first payloads I worked on at Intersonics was for
a sounding rocket flight. I attended the launch in White Sands,
NM - we watched from a concrete bunker about 500 ft. from the launch
pad. When the count got to about 15 about half of the people in
the bunker walked outside (out of the safety of the bunker) to watch
the launch. I went out too and stood there in awe as the rocket
ignited and a half a second later the sound arrived!
The only thing I can describe it as - a close lightning strike
that keeps going - a big KABOOOOOM!!!! that was so loud it made
my pant legs flap in the wind. The sad part was the rocket payload
we had worked a year on was smashed to tiny bits when the parachute
opened at 250,000 feet, melted into the ball - and then failed to
slow the rocket into re-entry. It made a 3-ft deep crater in the
desert!
Weogo: I think I'll stick to the shuttle launch recording thru
td-1s and Contrabasses!
Tom: Oh, that was fun, too.
Moderator: This concludes our chat session with Tom Danley - Tom,
thanks so much for your time, contributions to audio and also to
the LAB and Subwoofer Forums! And thanks Toni!
Charlie Hughes: Tom, thanks for your candor & sharing your
knowledge & experiences with us.
Tom: Thanks all - I really like coming to the LAB - let's do this
again!
|