|
Transcript
Pro Sound Web Live Chat
Brian Blackmore of Church Production
July 10, 2001
Moderated by Keith Clark
Page 2
|


1 2
3 4
 
|
Brian: Yes indeed. If you are a church who is looking to hire a
contractor or a consultant, I think it's helpful distinguish between
those who are Christian and those who have experience dealing with
churches. If you feel strongly about hiring a Christian company,
that's fine, but make sure that they have significant experience
and satisfied references.
Brian (continued): However, my personal feeling is that if you happen
across a company that you are comfortable with which does not happen
to be Christian owned and operated, then you have an opportunity
to witness. I've heard numerous stories from contractors about having
been impressed enough with certain church clients that they either
become Christians for the first time, or start going back to church
after having been away for many years.
marcus: Have you covered web casting or will you be covering it?
Seems like a powerful emerging tool.
Brian Blackmore: It's not something that we have done much on in
the magazine to date. But it is a powerful tool and I would expect
to see something about web casting on our 2002 Editorial Calendar.
What do you think?
marcus: I think it has tremendous outreach potential as the technology
evolves and we learn how to use it.
Brian Blackmore: Well I'll take it as our charge to help you learn
how to use it.
Drew: How do you decide who writes for Church Production?
Brian: I've had the opportunity to meet a great many fine technical
writers over the past few years. There are many freelance writers
out there, some more qualified than others. I look at the story
(the technologies involved, etc.) and then try to assign a writer
who is most knowledgeable on those subjects. We also invite the
technical directors, contractors and consultants to write about
their own projects, although we do not accept feature articles from
manufacturers.
Stephen K: Do you ever foresee the day when paper magazines go away,
replaced by e-alternatives?
Brian: Not in the foreseeable future. It's not viable from a business
standpoint, as the dot-bomb of the past six months well
illustrates.
Stephen K: Can you be a bit more specific? Why do folks still seem
to favor paper to a great degree?
Brian: Sure. As a serious tree killer (we use A LOT of paper) I
would feel much better about distributing the magazine in electronic
form. But the advertising revenue is not there. The mechanisms are
not in place to accurately audit the online readership. It's also
not convenient to take your computer with you so you can read an
article while you're on the potty ;-)
|