Uncomfortable Audio Experiences: Truths About Sound System & Loudspeaker Distortion
Crushing levels are absolutely not what the audio experience is about.
+- Print Email Share Comments (2) RSS RSS

We “Men of Audio,” as my friend Clifford Henricksen put it in one of his frequent moments of levity, fight either the good fight for good sound or high fidelity.

But let’s just take a look at the words high fidelity, or hi-fi.

Taken literally hi-fi large quantities of faithfulness to the original sound; in other words we’re talking truth, or purity. Accordingly, the next concern is how shall you judge fidelity, and how do you maximize it?

Criteria for Fidelity
Even frequency response. The desirability of flat response is self-evident, but in practice this is not as important as believed. This is fortunate for loudspeaker manufacturers as very few products are in fact flat.

The sound system is able to run comfortably, delivering the required sound levels.

Conservative operation is common sense and good practice when operating any kind of machine. As far as audio goes, it maintains headroom by giving peak signals room to breathe.

Absence of clipping, harmonics, artifacts, and so on. Signal integrity is where things go horribly wrong and are often completely out of control.

As it is the most important aspect of fidelity, we find ourselves all too frequently involved in an uncomfortable audio experience.

One is able to ameliorate frequency response, and a flat out sound system can always be turned down. As this is very often psychologically difficult for some people, one can always get in more amplifiers and speakers.

However, it is very rare, if not impossible, to regenerate a degraded signal. The concept of fidelity is replaced by all manner of noxious waveforms, which is a matter of great concern to me.

Apart from being entirely offensive, it is actually very damaging to human hearing. In fact, distortion is more damaging to hearing than level.

This is because distortion is often a clipped signal or a smooth sinusoidal waveform with the top chopped off leaving very sharp corners that now approximates a square wave containing excessive amounts of unwanted harmonics, which is very unnatural.

Our ears and brain are not designed to deal with such waveforms for extended periods of time.

If responsibility and care is not brought to bear on the situation, the whole industry is going to be faced with draconian level legislation where in fact the real culprit is distortion.


Comments (2) Most recent displayed first
Posted by flow  on  05/25/11  at  06:29 PM
so true.

we all love a big big sound. i'm from the underground techno scene, so we regularly partied to 40KW systems, in small venues.

the important thing is that they were clean. good signal levels, plenty of headroom, no clipping (except some dirty engineers on the subs!). its that environment where i learnt to tweak a system.

so why do so many people have mid heavy, screamingly unclean monsters?

my key guiding principle when tuning a system is pain. once you've rung out the stage, its time to turn up the main rig. turn it up slowly, until something starts to hurt. find and reduce that frequency. repeat. soon you'll find you have a beautiful, big sound that you can listen to all night long. and you'll also find you've got 1/10th the mid/upper mid (800-6k) than any of those hurty rigs. beautiful.

Posted by Ian  on  05/20/11  at  08:30 PM
I totally agree! I once attended a large concert in an arena with 10,000 plus attending. As the concert went on the sound guy kept cranking it further, not only did it become physically painful to be in the room but the upper mids were distorting horribly. I asked some friends who are not audio people at all and they completely agreed. So it was bad enough that people who weren't listening critically were offended by it.

I'm not sure how you can get a gig that big if you can't hear...

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.