Church Sound: Using Microphone Techniques To Attain A Better Result
Approaches for solving problems, improving quality

June 20, 2011, by Bruce Bartlett

mic techniques

Let’s face it - the live sound reinforcement realm presents some microphone challenges that regularly threaten sound quality.

Look at the conditions.

The monitors feed back. They leak into the vocal microphones and color the sound. The bass sound leaks into the drum mics, and the drums leak into the piano microphones.

And then there are the other mic-related gremlins - breath pops, lighting buzzes, wireless-mic glitches, and even electric shocks.

So let’s have a look at solving at least some of these problems.

Based on the experiences of live sound mixers,technicians, and operators, these suggestions will help control feedback and leakage, and help in delivering a clean, natural sound to the audience.

Get In Close
The first tip is to try to get in close to sources with directional mics. To start, place each mic within a few inches of its sound source.

Close micing increases the sound level at the microphone and makes the sound system louder.

Use unidirectional mics to reduce feedback and leakage. They reject sounds to the sides and rear of the mic, such as floor monitors.

Some examples of unidirectional patterns are cardioid, supercardioid, and hypercardioid.

Sometimes locating a mic right at the source can help. (click to enlarge)

Most directional mics boost the bass when you mic close. This is called the proximity effect. At low frequencies, it provides free gain (extra volume without feedback).

By the way, rolling off (reducing) this excess bass via a console’s EQ section reduces low-frequency leakage picked up by the mic.

Next, here’s an extreme way to get plenty of level into the mic: place the mic near the loudest part of the musical instrument.

Some typical positions are near the sound hole of an acoustic guitar, in the bell of a sax, or inside the shell of a tom-tom.

Use this method as a last resort because close mic’ing tends to color the tone quality, giving an unnatural sound.

Here’s why: Most musical instruments are designed to sound best at a distance (say, 1 1/2 or more feet away).

So, a flat-response mic placed there tends to pick up a natural or well-balanced timbre.

But when you get close, the part of the instrument that the mic is near is emphasized.

The tone quality that is picked up very close may not reflect the tone quality of the entire instrument.

For example, the sound hole of an acoustic guitar resonates strongly around 80 Hz to 100 Hz.

A mic placed close to the sound hole hears and emphasizes this low-frequency resonance, producing a bassy, boomy timbre that does not exist at a greater micing distance.

The close-mic’d sound is harsh, too. To make the guitar sound more natural when mic’d close to the sound hole, roll off the excess bass on the console or use a mic with a bass roll-off in its frequency response. Also dip out some 3 kHz to reduce harshness.

A sax mic’d in the bell sounds like a kazoo. To mellow it out, cut around 3 kHz and boost around 300 Hz. And if it’s possible to attain adequate gain-before-feedback with mic positions that sound more natural, by all means do so.

This placement likely emphasizes low-end resonance. (click to enlarge)

Making Contact
Another approach is to use contact pickups in tandem with microphones.

A contact pickup can solve feedback problems because it is sensitive to mechanical vibrations, not sound waves.

A pickup for an acoustic guitar usually sounds good near or under the bridge.

Unfortunately, the guitar sounds electric with a pickup because it misses the acoustic string sounds.

Many sound operators have had success with a hybrid method that combines a pickup with a mini mic. A pickup mounted under the bridge picks up the lows and provides volume and punch.

A mini hypercardioid mic is mounted just inside the sound hole facing in. It provides the treble and the clean acoustic string sound.

The pickup and microphone are mixed in a small two-input mixer provided as part of the system. The combination of the pickup and microphone provides a loud, punchy, yet natural sound with all the crispness of a real acoustic guitar.

It often helps to send the pickup signal just to the stage wedges (where feedback is worst), and send the mic signal just to the house loudspeakers. Using as few mics as possible can also be helpful. The more mics in use, the more likely it is to produce feedback.

The gain-before-feedback ratio decreases 3 dB each time the number of open mics doubles. Two mics at equal levels have 3 dB less gain than one mic; four mics have 3 dB less gain than two mics, and so on.

To reduce the number of open mics, turn off any mics not in use at the moment.

You might prefer to turn them down about 12 dB, rather than off, so you don’t miss cues.

Instead of using 10 mics on a drum set, try using a single miniature omni mic in the center of the set.

A mini mic is recommended because it has excellent high-frequency response in all directions -unlike a larger microphone.

Clip the mic to the right side of the snare drum rim, about 4 inches above the drum, and centered in the set. It will pick up the toms and cymbals all around it.

You’ll be amazed how good that single mic can sound. Boost the bass to add fullness. If the cymbals are too weak, lower them a few inches. Hang another mini mic in the kick drum, and it will sound full because omni condenser mics have deep bass response, no matter what their size.

A drawback of this approach is that the balance can’t be controlled among the toms and snare, except with mic placement.

On electric guitar and bass, try using direct boxes instead of mics.

Direct boxes pick up no feedback or leakage, and can be plugged directly into a connector following the musician’s effects boxes.

Could a DI box be a better approach than what’s being done here? (click to enlarge)

This method, however, misses the distortion of the guitar amplifier, which is often an essential part of the sound.

Cancel At Distance
Finally, try noise-canceling mics. A noise-canceling (or differential) mic for vocals is designed to cancel sounds at a distance, such as instruments on stage or monitor speakers.

Such a mic provides outstanding gain-before-feedback, and almost total isolation.

The differential mic was designed to cancel sounds beyond a few inches away, such as musical instruments on stage. As a result, many users have reported that their house mix has improved because the mic’s isolation is nearly complete.

In other words, “Mic 1” is no longer vocals and some drums, guitar and bass. “Mic 1” is vocals only.

Singers must use a differential mic with their lips touching the grille; otherwise, their voice gets canceled. This restriction is not a problem because many singers already kiss the mic.

But it can be a drawback if the singer likes to work the mic for effect.

A cardioid differential mic also rejects sound behind the microphone, say, from a floor monitor. Not only does this prevent feedback, it also reduces the sonic coloration caused by monitor sound leaking into the vocal mic.

Give these techniques a try, and you’re likely to find improved results by using one or more of them.

AES and SynAudCon member Bruce Bartlett is the author of “Practical Recording Techniques 5th Edition” and “Recording Music On Location.”



Return to articleReturn to article
Church Sound: Using Microphone Techniques To Attain A Better Result
http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/using_microphone_techniques_to_attain_a_better_result