Live Sound
Comments on: "The Top 10 Technical Concepts You Should Know"
image

That is, if you want to call yourself an audio professional…
View this entire articleView this entire article

Back to top
7 Comments (displaying chronologically) Post a comment
Posted by Einars CIntins  on  10/05  at  06:57 AM

As for the inverse square law - I think mentioning accoustic power and therefore using reference 6 dB being 4 times is confusing. I’d prefer dB SPL and that is on voltage domain, therefore 6 dB is 2 times. We actually can measure SPL with a tool called a microphone and it converts dB SPL to dBV. So it’s better not to mention term “power” here.

Posted by Norton Lawellin  on  10/05  at  11:02 AM

#2 - Yeah, polarity vs phase…
Reversing polarity (as in a mic input) simply reverses the 2 +/- wires. “Phase” implies a time lag, i.e. “We delayed that signal just enough to to have it arrive 180ยบ out of phase.”

Posted by Keith Clark  on  10/05  at  01:07 PM

Note From The Editor - thanks for pointing out the typos. They have been corrected. As a result, I have closed the comments related to them in order to avoid confusion. Again, my thanks to all who contributed corrections.

Posted by Cagey-B  on  10/05  at  03:26 PM

Karl,
    Another excellent article.  In my capacity
( FOH engineer for a major casino showroom ),
I’ve seen hundreds of visiting engineers.  Since
the vast majority of them have utilized our
in-house sound system, I’ve been able to compare
results achieved, which range from the sublime
to the horrendous.
    While I can’t speak to the specifics of
others’ knowledge, I have been able to observe
that, in general, the best engineers are those
who get down to business, and who aren’t rattled
when the system components and mic selection
are not their “favorites”.
    That being said, I have heard phenomenal
results from mixers who are knowledge-challenged.
It brings to mind an interview with Les Paul
I read many years ago.  Les said that Django
Reinhart, the fabulous swing-era guitarist,
confided that ha didn’t know where “C” was.
Go figure.

Posted by John Chittum  on  10/05  at  08:08 PM

This is a great article! I’ll be linking it to my blog which is geared toward practical problems for Electroacoustic composers. this will definitely help a lot in the learning process for those composers

Posted by johns  on  10/03  at  01:12 AM

well, this is really a nice post.I really like the way you start and conclude your thoughts. Thank you so much for this information. keep posting such good stuff.642-974 papers  642-982 questions  642-983 papers  646-046 pdf  646-205 pdf  646-223 questions  646-230 prep  646-364 pdf

Posted by Karl  on  11/27  at  11:54 PM

Good list.  When I taught techs from zero to something in a very limited time frame, if I could get them to grasp gain structure, they would be ok.  A nice thing to add to the discussion would be dual/multi channel FFT analysis as it is very usefull in dealing with items 10,9,8,5,2,1, and the only way to actually see phase.


Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.



Product Showcase
Advertising
Learn more about product showcase listings