Church Sound: The Perception Of Loudness Versus The Reality
The role of musical taste, style and composition
+- Print Email Share Comments (7) RSS RSS

It seems like every week I end up in a conversation about volume levels and that “so and so” thinks it’s too loud. 

A while back I discussed the more technical side of sound level, but today, let’s focus on perception.

In the space where I mix or act as producer almost every Sunday, we hold two very distinct services. The early service is more “traditional” (whatever that means) with brass, strings, organ, choir, and a worship team of vocalists.

The second service is all-out contemporary praise and worship with a little edge to it. The typical set includes drums, bass, acoustic, lead guitar, keyboard and one or two vocalists, and the musicians have mostly grown up in the 1980s and 90s, so big guitar (also used to be big hair) tend to rule the day.

We try to make sure sound pressure levels for this service don’t get out of hand. and to help get a better grip, I’ve started setting up the dB meter fpr every service to keep an eye on the average levels.  My friend Trevor, who mixes these contemporary services, refers to it as the speedometer (and I’m not sure if he means that in a positive way). 

Recently I decided to also use the meter during the traditional services so we could have some comparison. I’d expected the contemporary service to be 15 dB hotter than the traditional service, so was surprised that on certain Sundays (when the brass played), the traditional service actually hit peaks slightly hotter than the contemporary service!

For consistency, I monitored both services using a dB A weighting. The music in the traditional service averaged around 82 dBA, with peaks running around 88 dBA. The contemporary service averaged around 85 dBA with peaks in the low 90s.

With just 3 dB separating the level of the two services, why was nobody complaining about the levels in the traditional service?

One obvious reason is that A-Weighting was developed for lower volumes and the frequency response is weighted to the human ear. This means that the low frequency energy that we generate with the bass and the kick drum in the contemporary service does not register as much on the A weighted scale.

Why A-weighted measurements? OSHA loudness exposure ratings are based in A weighting. Really, the scale of weighting, A or C, is not all that important as long as the same one is used every time—AND—we understand what the weighting represents.

But I believe the main reason we don’t get complaints is due to musical style. In the traditional service, the organist playing an offertory can easily hit 90 dBA, and people will say it is “powerful.”

In addition, the peaks in our traditional services are generally very short lived - for example, the trumpets will hit an accent note that jumps out but it’s gone in an instant.

So I maintain that it really comes down to taste and the composition of the music. I usually enjoy a 100 to 105 dBA, contemporary Christian concert, but wouldn’t stay in the room for a heavy metal band playing at that same level. 

My parting suggestion would be to document the levels of your services so that you have a consistent reference point to refer to. This comes in really handy when the inevitable and constant subject of volume levels rears its head again… and again… and again…

Gary Zandstra is a professional AV systems integrator with Parkway Electric and has been involved with sound at his church for more than 25 years.


Comments (7) Most recent displayed first | All comments in chronological order
Posted by shawnlee100  on  09/29/11  at  11:55 PM
There is a really cool chart along with a great article dealing with frequency and perceived volume. Something I was taught a long time ago, and always had held as true, is verified by experiment. 50Hz at 90dB sounds equivalent to 1200Hz at 55dB. Also, keyboards with an orchestral patch will sound pretty pleasant,ccda \ ITIL V3 \ scjp exam \ ceh \ Oracle Certification \ Cisco Certification \ ccsp \ ccip training
Posted by Dave Chitty  on  09/21/11  at  12:24 PM
There is another point to consider:

The "headroom" of the system in question.

A properly designed sound system can operate at higher SPL's without distortion, sounding cleaner and easier on the ears.

An under-powered system can distort at a lower SPL and will not sound as good, no matter the mix.

Posted by Ken Erickson  on  09/16/11  at  04:01 PM
There is a really cool chart along with a great article dealing with frequency and perceived volume. Something I was taught a long time ago, and always had held as true, is verified by experiment. 50Hz at 90dB sounds equivalent to 1200Hz at 55dB. Also, keyboards with an orchestral patch will sound pretty pleasant, but electric guitar with a lot of distortion will sound really loud, at the same level. The article can be found here: http://www.behindthemixer.com/content/the-amazing-audio-adventure-of-fletcher-and-munson
Posted by Gary z  on  09/15/11  at  10:19 AM
Great comments. I totally agree. The main objective of writing the article was to raise the issue and give a novis engineer a place to start.

Z

Posted by kbo  on  09/14/11  at  11:27 AM
I have a solution for you!

Tell the organ player to get in on the contemporary action and throw in an upbeat southern gospel song with a bass singer. You'll be amazed at how people respond to upbeat and powerful music when it's done just a little different than normal.


+ View all comments on this article

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.