A Great Mix? Sometimes It Depends On Who You Ask…
“That was the most amazing show I've ever heard!” When someone walks out of a concert saying this, is it accurate?
+- Print Email Share Comments (7) RSS RSS

Mixing sound in the live realm is not rocket science. In fact, it’s probably closer to voodoo.

A studio engineer creates a masterpiece that will (hopefully) live forever in permanent hard copy existence. 

But the very nature of a live mixing dictates that every show will be unique - and that none will be perfect. 

A front of house engineer is in the business of creating a memory. Impact, excitement and anticipation form the landscape of the journey you’re guiding the audience through. Perception is everything.

“That was the most amazing show I’ve ever heard!” When someone walks out of a concert saying this, is it accurate?

Are they referring to fidelity, tonal balance, and mix perfection? Or is it possibly the impact, anticipation, and excitement that affected them in an emotional way?

We can’t force the audience to have fun, but we can make sure the audience hears the most important aspects of the music while doing our best to mask and acoustically downplay any negative issues that arise.

Imagine mixing a show with the utmost finesse, articulating a series of precision and complex cues, and then an irritating knucklehead from the audience leans over the console and says, “Hey man, can’t hear the keyboard.”

My first thought is to strangle the annoying punter. He obviously knows nothing about the intricacies of mixing or he’d be behind the console, right?

Well, maybe not. Sometimes as engineers we get so wrapped up in displaying the depth of our skills that we forget exactly what is most fundamental and important. 

Have you ever heard an engineer fumbling with effects while the mix sounds tragic? Don’t kid yourself - 95 percent or more of the audience has no idea and really does not care whether you used a macro-pristine-ultra-chamber or a $20,000 tube comp on each of the 12 vocals.

What they do care about:

  • Can they hear the vocals?
  • Can they also hear the vocals?
  • Can they hear everything else?
  •  
  • Does it capture their attention, take them to a state of bliss, happiness, rage, or whatever direction that particular music is supposed to take them, so they can stop worrying about whether they can hear the vocals?

No matter what goes wrong sound-wise during a live performance, if it’s noticed from the audience perspective, then the problem belongs to the house engineer. There are no excuses.

Here’s the important point for engineers: “NOTICE.”

Example:
The show starts and all seems good, but then I realize there’s no guitar microphone in PA left. I can immediately turn it on and “fix” the problem, also thereby instantly letting 10,000 people know about the goof.

Or, I can slowly pan the guitar mic to center, then left, and back to center. If I dialed it up correctly, then for the next song the odds are that the problem has now actually become a cool guitar effect. It’s not about hiding mistakes; it’s about giving the audience the best show possible.

“That snare sound is my sonic signature!” Yes, someone did tell me this once, and yes, it’s got to be one of the most irritating things I’ve ever heard. 

If the audience is focused on the way we mix, we’re fighting an uphill battle. I realize that there are many situations where the sound engineer is an integral part of creative process of the show. But the point remains - don’t muck with the frill until the basics are dialed in.

It all comes down to this: drawing attention to the mix, rather than the performers on stage, is often good for the ego. But it can be bad for the career.

Dave Rat heads up Rat Sound, based in Southern California, and has also been a mix engineer for more than 25 years.

Other Articles By Dave Rat:
Setting Microphone Polarity For Live Sound
Smart Amplifiers = Huge Changes In Professional Audio
Tips For Testing Loudspeakers
Strategies For Mixing A Rock Show


Source: Live Sound International

Discover the art of sound through insightful and in-depth coverage of the people, technologies and ideas that are transforming the professional live audio world.
Subscribe today!
Comments (7) Most recent displayed first | All comments in chronological order
Posted by David Patterson  on  11/04/11  at  12:45 AM
Jim, those aren't engineers. Engineers would be able to hear the effects you are using, and probably identify the box.

Those people are musicians who WISH they were engineers, and tell all their friends they ARE engineers.

Those people are why we can't make a living, and why we get bad press. Those people don't know the difference between polarity and phase.

BUT, they know how to schmooz. Chances are one of them will be your next crew chief.

Posted by Jim  on  11/03/11  at  10:15 PM
Absolutely right on!! I've had other 'engineers' come up after the first 16 bars of the song and tell me 'hey what kind of effects are you using on the (vocals, guitars, drums, )? I usually tell them "exactly what you hear".

At that point I'm still balancing the guitarist that gave me only 30% of his current stage volume at sound check (if there was one) against the mousy voiced female lead singer during mike/monitor check that is now coming dangerously close to putting my midrange baskets against the back wall, and trying to get the keyboard into the mix because he keeps turning it down because it sounds too loud in the monitors for him.

Of course this is precluded by the fact that everyone was standing around before the show because the drummer showed up too late to do an adequate sound check.

Yeah, I'm way too busy trying to get an acceptable mix down before I begin enhancing the turd to make it a little shinier.....

Posted by David Patterson  on  10/30/11  at  12:42 AM
Bill and Cagey both have valid points.

I hear far too many mixers who seem to think that every show, regardless of musical genre is supposed to sound like Metallica. What it sounds like is thundering bass droning, muddying, and masking everything else. Too many concerts end up sounding like a ghetto car stereo.

Cagey, what's missing from a muddy bass mix is NOT bass, it's mid range. You know, the mid range which gets cut at the crossover so people can't see the smiley face on the graph. Such engineers grew up boosting the bass on their home/car stereos, 100Hz. That's the only frequency they know to get "Mo Betta" bass. It's also the mo muddy frequency!

Try listening to "The Real Me" by The Who. Entwistle's bass is awesome, but there is virtually nothing coming from the subs.

Mid range is where most of the interesting instrumental interplay and vocal clarity lives. Why on earth would anybody dump those frequencies!?!

Posted by Cagey-B  on  10/27/11  at  11:27 AM
I'm firmly convinced that the beauty of a mix is in the ear ( or other body part ) of the "be-hearer". We recently were visited by a popular rock band that shall remain nameless. The FOH engineer ( ditto on namelessness ) delivered a mix that, to my ears, left a lot to be desired. Specifically, one in maybe ten words sung ( or spoken ) by the lead singer was understandable. Also, despite the fact that the bass player was a featured performer, I can honestly say that I did not hear one distinct bass note the entire performance. Nevertheless, the comments made by departing fans ranged from "atrocious" ( I'm down with that ) to "great mix". Though I'm not familiar with this band's studio recordings, thinking about the "great mix" comments gives me a headache.
Posted by Bill Borgh  on  10/25/11  at  02:11 PM
Dave,

You nailed it.

You also touched on another pet peeve of mine. Too many engineers (I use that term loosely) are one trick ponies. They rely on their “signature sound” for every genre of music. The sonic signatures for rock drums are typically way different than for funk or jazz. Same with the bass guitar sound in these different types of genres. Listen closely . . . the drums for Prince sound way different than AC / DC. I don’t go to hear a big band and want to have their drummer sound like Neil Peart.


+ View all comments on this article

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.